dealer login
First Action - Internet Safety for Children

Protect Your Children Online
Protecting Our Children in Cyberspace
Protecting Children from Unsuitable Materials from the Internet:  What Can and Can’t Be Done.
THE BOTTOM LINE:  Parental Involvement Will Keep Children Safe On The Internet.


Protect Your Children Online - Part 1
 
During our everyday life, we concern ourselves mainly with physical security; tightening our seat belts, locking our house door when we leave, etc.  However, there is another menace out there that is creeping into our society.  This menace is Cyberstalking, the exploiting of our children through the Internet. 

In my professional role in the Security Industry, I preach the values of the Internet, not only for us as adults and professionals, but also for our children.  Our children have almost immediate access to any kind of information available throughout the world.  Want to read A Tale Of Two Cities? It’s on the Internet.  Have a question about who the third person to land on the moon was?  It’s on the Internet.  However, want to be exposed to nudity, pedophiles, and thousands (if not millions) of other social deviants?  You bet, it is on the Internet and just a key touch away from your child or grandchild.  So, what do we do about this?

First, we educate ourselves.  Go to The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children website at www.ncmec.org and download their study “Online Victimization - A Report on the Nation’s Youth.” This report will provide an eye-opening look at the perils our children are under every time they access America Online, Compuserve, or the Internet via the local Internet Service Provider.  It also provides a telling survey on how parents deal with their children’s use of the Internet.  For example, over 85% of parents have talked with their children about being careful talking to strangers on the Net, and 97% of those polled check every now and then on what is on their child’s computer screen.  But, only half the parents ever go back and actually check history to ensure the child is indeed staying out of potential problem sites, and only 39% set a limit on the amount of time their child can be on the Internet. Though it appears that parents do realize the potential exposure their children have on the Net, less than 1/2 play a truly diligent role in ensuring their child is protected.

Second, we educate others.  Gather information from such sites as The National Center and tens of other child advocacy sites (including www.pta.org), and speak to your fellow parents in your school system about the dangers presented to our children on the Internet.  Stay tuned for future articles on ways to prevent your children from being exposed to unsuitable material.  Bottom line:  be involved with your child’s Internet experience.  They now have the world, literally, at their fingertips.  Make the effort to have it at yours also.   Part 2 explains the warning signs that your child is having a bad experience online.

back to top


Protecting Our Children in Cyberspace - Part 2
The Warning Signs of Unsuitable Use or Contact From the Internet
 
The signs may be very subtle;  your child seems more withdrawn than usual, strange phone calls are ringing into your house.  In the past, these may have been perceived as a child going through a “crisis”, or someone too embarrassed to acknowledge that they dialed a wrong number.  However, in the days of Internet communication, it is important that a parent pays particular attention to their child’s activity on the Internet and takes action should they recognize changes in their child’s behavior or in the overall behavior of the house.
 
The Internet has become a vast and great resource for our children to learn things they would never have had the opportunity to learn otherwise.  We all remember having to go to the library to research our next term paper using the World Book encyclopedia or the Periodicals catalog.  The Internet Age has allowed our children to receive, almost instantaneously, information it would otherwise have taken days to receive.  This “instantaneous” aspect of the Internet is also what makes our children vulnerable to material that is unsuitable for our minor - age children to see.
 
The major Internet access sites, including America Online, MSN, Earthlink, and others, have made it increasingly difficult for children to receive unsuitable material through their Internet connections.  These services have also allowed the parent to restrict even more the online experience of their children.  It is important that a parent reviews these increased security options and determine if they are applicable to the online situation. 
 
However, most of these sites still allow access of minors to sites that are conducive to chatting and instant messages.  It is these areas, as well as electronic mail, that provide the greatest risk to our children.  Unlike the typical phone call, the Internet has no “face” or “voice” from which to somehow identify the person our child is communicating to.  The person happily chatting with our child via the Weather Channel chat room about cumulonimbus clouds and the report the child is writing could just as easily be a 50 year old pedophile waiting for his chance to trap the child into divulging personal information about themselves and their location. 
 
It is extremely important that we advocate to our school communities the hazards which exist for our children on the Internet.  There are resources available to you that will expand on the signs of abuse and the steps to take in protecting your child from experiencing this unsuitable content on the Internet.  For starters, here are several warning signs that may show your child is using the Internet in unsuitable ways:

  1. Your child spends most of their home time on the Internet. 
  2. Your child quickly turns off the monitor or shuts the computer down when you enter the computer room.
  3. You receive phone calls from strangers asking to speak to your child. 
  4. You recognize outgoing phone calls, mostly long distance, from your residence to phone numbers you do not recognize.
  5. Your child begins receiving gifts from people and addresses that you do not recognize.
  6. Your child’s personality begins to change, becoming more combative when it comes to time spent on the computer or their ability to access the Internet.
  7. You pull up pornographic or other unsuitable materials from your computer’s hard drive.

In the next addition, I’ll detail steps the parent can take in monitoring and helping to ensure that their child is not being exploited on the Internet.

back to top


Protecting Children from Unsuitable Materials from the Internet: 
What Can and Can’t Be Done. (Part 3)

 
In the previous two articles related to protecting our children from unsuitable materials received or retrieved from the Internet, I explained the overall problem and the warning signs children may show when they are being unsuitably influenced from these materials or contacts.  The next two articles will explain to you what steps the Commission for the Online Protection of Children  (COPC) and the pitfalls each of these steps presents.

There are many steps we could take to protect our children from unsuitable materials we see in everyday life.  We could hide the newspaper from them so that they won’t see any articles or advertisements, throw away the television, trash the VCR, etc.  Obviously, these are not the types of steps we want, nor should take.  The Internet is a vast resource of good information for our children to use and to grow by.  However, those sites and publishers of adult material know this also, and have a very powerful weapon at there disposal to use when the screws are tightened for them to clean up their act.  That tool is the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The First Amendment, for those of you who have been out of 8th grade Civics class for a while, gives Americans the right of free speech.  This amendment does not state that we have the right to free, and suitable, speech; the right to speech suitable to all Americans,  the right of speech that does not include pornography.  This is what the adult entertainment industry uses as their defense to all encroachments on their ability to market and sell their materials.  Government has been effective in a couple areas of entertainment in at least providing consumers with information that content may not be suitable for children as in movie ratings and parental advisory stickers on music.  However, this does not prevent young children from purchasing or viewing this type of material.  It also does not provide recourse back to the seller for this material being available for use to children. 

The COPC has reviewed how other industries handle this problem, and have incorporated these same processes into their recommendations.  There is currently software available to the consumer that may be installed on PC’s that block specific content from the Internet.  This software will also provide reports that show attempts made to access sites.  Some software will also allow access to sites to the point where explicit material is accessed, kicking the user off the Internet when that area is reached.  This process is effective to a point.  That point is where it interferes with the ability for a young user to gain valuable and useful information on a topic the software may see as offensive, including research on breast cancer (breast is a “lockout” word), other forms of reproductive cancers, etc.  This type of material we want our children to be able to access.  The software does not make it easy to add/remove words such as this, so it becomes a complex issue.  The recommendation has also been made to add rating designations to websites.  This presents basically the same issues experienced in the entertainment industry, with one exception.  It is hard to verify that the person actually sitting at the computer is under 18 years of age.  With the knowledge most of our children have today, it is not difficult to circumvent the system. 

The COPC has also made recommendations to add domain names that reflect the content being marketed or distributed by the sites.  This would include domains such as .XXX or .SEX for adult entertainment sites.  Again, the First Amendment argument arises in that these domain names make it easier to filter out this material which they are free to distribute.  It would also provide an unwanted designation on the site that would make it more recognizable as an adult entertainment site and drop the number of hits to the page.  As you can tell, any type of filtering, monitoring, or labeling of such sites will create endless legal disputes that will tie this issue up for years.

In the last article in this series, I’ll state what the commission’s final recommendation is, as well as what other advocacy groups have to say on this issue.

back to top


THE BOTTOM LINE: 
Parental Involvement Will Keep Children Safe On The Internet.

 
As I wrap up this four part series on keeping children safe from unwanted materials and contact on the Internet, I cannot stress enough how critical it is to get the word out that  there are indeed perils lurking for not only children but for anyone who commits the mistake of divulging too much information to strangers.  Though these articles are geared towards protecting children, the adult reading these articles can also pay heed to the recommendations.  As you visit friend’s or acquaintances homes, look for a computer in the home and remind the customer of these facts. 

The bottom line to protecting children from unwanted materials or solicitations from the Internet, as recommended by the Commission for the Online Protection of Children, is to increase public education of the Internet as well as providing parents with the necessary tools and information to be actively involved in their child’s experience. The Commission feels that government and the private sector should undertake a major education campaign to promote public awareness of technologies and methods available to protect children online.  The campaign should “stress the importance of involving caregivers in a child’s online activity; the availability of both offline resources and one-click-away Internet technologies; access to child friendly sites; information about the range of technologies available to protect children; and information about testing and assessment of new technologies.”

The key to making this type of policy work is to put the method and means of protecting the children in the parent’s / caregiver’s hands.  Allow the parent / caregiver the opportunity to pick the style and substance of protection for their children without a government mandate on what software or what acceptable use can be undertaken.  This flexibility will allow the parent / caregiver to tailor their financial abilities to purchase any filtering or monitoring software with the balance of providing hands-on care with their child.  The Commission, as well as a number of parent and child advocacy groups, support this position. 

The Commission also supports increasing the programs and penalties available to law enforcement for the prosecution of those who use the Internet to traffic unsuitable materials.  The offender who stalked a 13-year old girl in Texas through the Internet, subsequently molesting her, received only 1 year in prison and is now back on the streets.  The Commission recommends a list similar to that for dead-beat parents and child molesters that identify these cyber-stalkers, as well as the ISP’s that provide hosting for the content.  This list would be readily accessible on the Web.  Finally in terms of law enforcement, the recommendation is made to provide increased funding to fight international aspects of Internet crime, including obscenity and child pornography.  This would involve agreements with countries addressing the extradition and gathering of evidence in cases involving international distribution of obscenity and child pornography over the Internet. 

As seen recently in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to review the constitutionality of the Children’s Online Protection Act of 1998 in this coming fall’s Court session, this matter will continue to be argued and defended in our court system.  Though we need strict laws and punishments for those who prey upon our children, this alone will not prevent our children from being victimized.  It will only be with the attention and care that we as parent’s give our children as they venture out onto the wide expanses of the Internet to gain knowledge and insight into millions of bits of information that will enable us to make this a safe venue for them.  Parent involvement.  The real bottom line.

back to top

 

 

website by